Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Coleman v. Maryland Parole Commission, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Leon Coleman filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Maryland Parole Commission and various parole officials which was dismissed by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-09-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6739

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Leon Coleman filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Maryland Parole Commission and various parole officials which was dismissed by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Coleman v. Maryland Parole Commission, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Leon Coleman filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Maryland Parole Commission and various parole officials which was dismissed by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6739

    LEON COLEMAN, a/k/a Mr.,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION; COMMISSIONER C. BEIKERT; T.
    HOWELL, #23; COMMISSIONER PATTERSON; ALL PAROLE AGENTS,
    PAROLE ASSOCIATES, NAMES UNKNOWN,
    Defendants Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Benson Everett Legg, Chief District
    Judge. (1:09-cv-00749-BEL)

    Submitted:

    August 26, 2009

    Before TRAXLER,
    Judges.

    Chief

    Judge,

    Decided: September 3, 2009

    and

    GREGORY

    and

    SHEDD,

    Circuit

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Leon Coleman, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Leon

    Coleman

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.


    1915(e)(2)(B) (2006).
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    See Coleman v. Maryland Parole Commn,

    No. 1:09-cv-00749-BEL (D. Md. April 9, 2009).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like