Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Glenn v. Baker, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Kaimel Glenn's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against April Baker. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its June 5, 2009 order dismissing the case. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-10-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7299

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Kaimel Glenn's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against April Baker. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its June 5, 2009 order dismissing the case. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Glenn v. Baker, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Kaimel Glenn's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against April Baker. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its June 5, 2009 order dismissing the case. The Court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7299

    KAIMEL GLENN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    APRIL BAKER,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    William D. Quarles, Jr., District
    Judge. (1:09-cv-00388-WDQ)

    Submitted:

    October 20, 2009

    Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge,


    HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Decided:

    NIEMEYER,

    October 27, 2009

    Circuit

    Judge,

    and

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kaimel Glenn, Appellant Pro Se.


    Philip Melton Andrews, Mary
    Beth Ewen, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kaimel

    Glenn

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Glenn v. Baker, No. 1:09-cv-00388-WDQ (D. Md. filed June

    4, 2009 & entered June 5, 2009).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like