Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hampton v. Bradford, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Howard Hampton's Bivens complaint against several federal officials. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. As such, the appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-10-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6880

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Howard Hampton's Bivens complaint against several federal officials. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. As such, the appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Hampton v. Bradford, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Howard Hampton's Bivens complaint against several federal officials. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. As such, the appeals court affirmed the lower court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6880

    HOWARD A. HAMPTON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RICHARDO Y. BRADFORD; G. JACKSON; GARY AARON;
    JOHN HAHN,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-94-1282)
    Submitted:

    October 17, 1996

    Decided:

    October 25, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Howard A. Hampton, Appellant Pro Se. George Maralan Kelley, III,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing
    his Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the on the reasoning of the district court. Hampton v. Bradford, No. CA-94-1282 (E.D. Va. May 3, 1996). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of


    Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
    2

    You might also like