Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mfume I v. Evatt, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Rastaman Mtume Obalaji Mfume I in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Appellant relief based on the reasoning in the district court's February 20, 1996 opinion in the case.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-10-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6447

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Rastaman Mtume Obalaji Mfume I in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Appellant relief based on the reasoning in the district court's February 20, 1996 opinion in the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Mfume I v. Evatt, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Rastaman Mtume Obalaji Mfume I in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Appellant relief based on the reasoning in the district court's February 20, 1996 opinion in the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6447

    RASTAMAN MTUME OBALAJI MFUME I, a/k/a Herbert


    Lee Bailey,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    PARKER EVATT; WILLIAM R. DAVIS;
    ARCHIE; MILAN O. BRADOVICH,

    JAMES

    R.
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-94-3177-0-20BD)
    Submitted:

    October 17, 1996

    Decided:

    October 24, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Rastaman Mtume Obalaji Mfume I, Appellant Pro Se. William Paul
    Griggs, GRIGGS, SPRUILL & HARRIS, Cheraw, South Carolina, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Mfume I v. Evatt, No. CA-94-3177-0-20BD (D.S.C. Feb. 20,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like