Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Shippy v. Harold, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Perry Shippy under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court had denied Shippy's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), finding no reversible error. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and also found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning for denying Shippy's complaint. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-10-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6748

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Perry Shippy under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court had denied Shippy's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), finding no reversible error. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and also found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning for denying Shippy's complaint. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Shippy v. Harold, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Perry Shippy under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court had denied Shippy's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), finding no reversible error. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and also found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning for denying Shippy's complaint. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6748

    PERRY SHIPPY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    D. HAROLD; D. MOSS; C. EVANS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-96-307)
    Submitted:

    October 17, 1996

    Decided:

    October 24, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Perry Shippy, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
    1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L.
    No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and
    the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Shippy v.
    Harold, No. CA-96-307 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 1996). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like