Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Andrews v. Fox, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    1) Anthony Andrews appealed the district court's denial of his motions for reconsideration under Rules 59(e) and 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision denying Andrews' motions for reconsideration based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its orders.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-04-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7391

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Anthony Andrews appealed the district court's denial of his motions for reconsideration under Rules 59(e) and 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision denying Andrews' motions for reconsideration based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its orders.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Andrews v. Fox, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Anthony Andrews appealed the district court's denial of his motions for reconsideration under Rules 59(e) and 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision denying Andrews' motions for reconsideration based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its orders.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7391

    ANTHONY ANDREWS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JAMES C. FOX, District Judge; MS. LIBBY, Staff
    Attorney,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    District Judge. (CA-04-247-5-H)

    Submitted:

    March 13, 2006

    Decided:

    April 7, 2006

    Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony Andrews, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony

    Andrews

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    orders

    denying his motions for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.


    59(e)

    and

    60(b).

    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motions for abeyance as


    moot, deny the motion to recuse, and affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court.

    See Andrews v. Fox, No. CA-04-247-5-H (E.D.N.C.

    filed July 11, 2005 & entered July 14, 2005; filed Oct. 7, 2005 &
    entered Oct. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like