Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Greene v. Robinson, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views3 pages
    Victor Greene filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Greene appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and concluded the denial of relief was appropriate based on the reasoning provided by the lower court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-12-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6839

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Victor Greene filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Greene appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and concluded the denial of relief was appropriate based on the reasoning provided by the lower court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views3 pages

    Greene v. Robinson, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Victor Greene filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Greene appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and concluded the denial of relief was appropriate based on the reasoning provided by the lower court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6839

    VICTOR COLLYN GREENE,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    BISHOP ROBINSON, Secretary of Public Safety
    and Corrections; THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden;
    RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner; PATRICK CONROY,
    Facility Administrator; WILLIAM H. BRITTON;
    VERONICA MOORE, CMSII; LIEUTENANT EYLER; RON
    WILLIAMS, CMSII; KASSIDY SAVAGE; LIEUTENANT
    REDD; OFFICER ELLIOT, COII; MARSHA MALOFF,
    Facility Administrator; MS. BOOSE, CMSS;
    MS. SMITH, CMSII; MS. SPRIGGS, CMSI; WILSON,
    CMSI; SERGEANT RINGLY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
    (CA-95-1513-JFM)
    Submitted:

    December 12, 1996

    Decided:

    December 19, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Victor Collyn Greene, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith LaneWeber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
    his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Greene
    v. Robinson, No. CA-95-1513-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 12, 1996). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like