You are on page 1of 3

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7101

TOMMY R. ROBINSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HOWARD COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; POLICE CHIEF;
THOMAS M. MARTIN, Detective; RICHARD WITTE,
Detective; KELLY SMITH, Officer; RICHARD
RUTLEDGE, Officer; M. T. HARDING, Officer;
MICHAEL MARTIN, Officer; VICTORIA PLANK, Officer; WILLIAM SEIFERT, Officer; NATHAN RETTIG,
Officer; MICHAEL PRICE, Officer; UNIDENTIFIED
MD STATE TROOPER; V. WILLIAM, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
NORMAN SNYDER, Detective; K-9, Dino; SUSAN
REIDER, Officer; KEITH FISHER, Officer,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge.
(CA-94-393-HAR)
Submitted:

January 11, 1996

Decided:

January 23, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.


Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tommy R. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara McFaul Cook, County


Solicitor, Rebecca Ann Laws, COUNTY SOLICITOR'S OFFICE, Ellicott
City, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's denial of his motion
for court-appointed counsel. We dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291
(1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is
neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral
order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

You might also like