Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ward v. Maloney, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    1) Mark Ward appealed a district court order denying his post-judgment motion for the district court judge to recuse himself from a case regarding Ward's pension plan. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of the recusal motion. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in the district court's July 30, 2007 order denying the recusal motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-10-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-1793

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Mark Ward appealed a district court order denying his post-judgment motion for the district court judge to recuse himself from a case regarding Ward's pension plan. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of the recusal motion. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in the district court's July 30, 2007 order denying the recusal motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Ward v. Maloney, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Mark Ward appealed a district court order denying his post-judgment motion for the district court judge to recuse himself from a case regarding Ward's pension plan. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of the recusal motion. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in the district court's July 30, 2007 order denying the recusal motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-1793

    MARK A. WARD,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    PETER E. MALONEY, Plan
    Television Corporation,

    Administrator,

    LIN
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior
    District Judge. (1:05-cv-00424-WLO)

    Submitted:

    October 11, 2007

    Decided:

    October 15, 2007

    Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Mark A. Ward, Appellant Pro Se. William McCardell Furr, WILLCOX &
    SAVAGE, Norfolk, Virginia; Robert K. Taylor, PARTRIDGE, SNOW &
    HAHN, LLP, Providence, Rhode Island, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Mark A. Ward appeals the district courts order denying
    his post judgment motion for the district court judge to recuse
    himself. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
    court. Ward v. Maloney, No. 1:05-cv-00424 (M.D.N.C. July 30, 2007).
    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like