Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Belinda Ann Baker v. T.E. MacKnight Detective The Richmond Police Department, 900 F.2d 249, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to plaintiff Belinda Ann Baker under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 in her case against defendant T.E. MacKnight and the Richmond Police Department. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal is without merit and affirms the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1990-04-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 900 F.2d 249 Docket: 89-7236

    Original Title

    Belinda Ann Baker v. T.E. MacKnight Detective the Richmond Police Department, 900 F.2d 249, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to plaintiff Belinda Ann Baker under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 in her case against defendant T.E. MacKnight and the Richmond Police Department. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal is without merit and affirms the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    Belinda Ann Baker v. T.E. MacKnight Detective The Richmond Police Department, 900 F.2d 249, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to plaintiff Belinda Ann Baker under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 in her case against defendant T.E. MacKnight and the Richmond Police Department. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal is without merit and affirms the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    900 F.

    2d 249
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Belinda Ann BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    T.E. MACKNIGHT, Detective; the Richmond Police
    Department
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 89-7236.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: March 5, 1990.
    Decided: March 21, 1990.
    Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied April 13, 1990.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (C/A No. 89-520N)
    Belinda Ann Baker, appellant pro se.
    G. Timothy Oksman, Michele Anne Gillette, City Attorney's Office,
    Richmond, Va., for appellees.
    E.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Belinda Ann Baker seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Baker v. MacKnight, CA-89-520-N (E.D.Va.
    Nov. 17, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like