Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1990 in which Andrew Maurice Maryland appealed a district court ruling denying him relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal without merit. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court, which found that Maryland's claims did not warrant relief under § 1983. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1990-09-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 914 F.2d 1491 Docket: 89-6809

    Original Title

    Andrew Maurice Maryland v. Larry W. Jarvis, Richard R. Mayfield, John W. Appleford, Thomas R. Israel, Attorney General's Office, Major Armentrout, Debbie Cook, Corporal Swisher, Mrs. Montgomery, Unknown Member of Adjustment Committee, 914 F.2d 1491, 4th Cir. (1990)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1990 in which Andrew Maurice Maryland appealed a district court ruling denying him relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal without merit. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court, which found that Maryland's claims did not warrant relief under § 1983. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1990 in which Andrew Maurice Maryland appealed a district court ruling denying him relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal without merit. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court, which found that Maryland's claims did not warrant relief under § 1983. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    914 F.

    2d 1491
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Andrew Maurice MARYLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Larry W. JARVIS, Richard R. Mayfield, John W. Appleford,
    Thomas R. Israel, Attorney General's Office, Major
    Armentrout, Debbie Cook, Corporal Swisher, Mrs.
    Montgomery,
    Unknown Member of Adjustment Committee, DefendantsAppellees.
    No. 89-6809.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Aug. 27, 1990.
    Decided Sept. 26, 1990.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    Virginia, at Harrisonburg. James H. Michael, Jr., District Judge. (CA-88155-H)
    Andrew Maurice Maryland, appellant pro se.
    Richard Francis Gorman, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia,
    Richmond, for appellees.
    W.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
    Circuit Judge.

    PER CURIAM:

    Andrew Maurice Maryland appeals from the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this
    appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Maryland v. Jarvis, CA-88-155-H (W.D.Va. Aug. 31, 1989). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like