Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Gordon, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Colin Gordon appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-05-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-8283

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Colin Gordon appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Gordon, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Colin Gordon appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-8283

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    COLIN F. GORDON, a/k/a
    Donald, a/k/a Daddy,

    Big

    Daddy,

    a/k/a

    Christopher

    A.

    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, Chief
    District Judge. (3:04-cr-00023-JPJ-1)

    Submitted:

    April 23, 2009

    Decided:

    May 1, 2009

    Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Colin F. Gordon, Appellant Pro Se.


    Nancy Spodick Healey,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Colin

    F.

    Gordon

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction


    of sentence.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    United States v. Gordon, No. 3:04-cr-00023-JPJ-

    1 (W.D. Va. Oct. 10, 2008).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like