Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ingram v. Henderson, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    18 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's granting of summary judgment to the defendant in an employment discrimination case brought by Judy M. Ingram against the Postmaster General. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Court also decided oral arguments were not necessary because the case was adequately presented on existing documents.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-09-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-1200

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's granting of summary judgment to the defendant in an employment discrimination case brought by Judy M. Ingram against the Postmaster General. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Court also decided oral arguments were not necessary because the case was adequately presented on existing documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    18 views2 pages

    Ingram v. Henderson, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's granting of summary judgment to the defendant in an employment discrimination case brought by Judy M. Ingram against the Postmaster General. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Court also decided oral arguments were not necessary because the case was adequately presented on existing documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-1200

    JUDY M. INGRAM,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster
    United States Postal Service,

    General,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
    District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Elizabeth V. Hallanan,
    Senior District Judge. (CA-99-108-2)

    Submitted:

    August 29, 2000

    Decided:

    September 11, 2000

    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Theodore R. Dues, Jr., THEODORE R. DUES, JR., L.C., Charleston,
    West Virginia, for Appellant.
    Rebecca A. Betts, United States
    Attorney, Michael L. Keller, Assistant United States Attorney,
    Charleston, West Virginia; Thomas J. Marshall, Acting Managing
    Counsel, Legal Policy, Steven F. Hirsch, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Judy M. Ingram appeals the district courts order granting
    summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging employment
    discrimination.

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error.


    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    Accordingly, we
    See Ingram v.

    Henderson, No. CA-99-108-2 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 24, 2000). We dispense


    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like