Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Sherlocke Evan Francis Holmes v. Edward W. Murray W.P. Rogers Thomas R. Israel, 849 F.2d 605, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Sherlocke Evan Francis Holmes appealed a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit. The Fourth Circuit denied Holmes's motion for intervention or injunction and did not require oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-05-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 849 F.2d 605 Docket: 88-7575

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Sherlocke Evan Francis Holmes appealed a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit. The Fourth Circuit denied Holmes's motion for intervention or injunction and did not require oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Sherlocke Evan Francis Holmes v. Edward W. Murray W.P. Rogers Thomas R. Israel, 849 F.2d 605, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Sherlocke Evan Francis Holmes appealed a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit. The Fourth Circuit denied Holmes's motion for intervention or injunction and did not require oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    849 F.

    2d 605
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Sherlocke Evan Francis HOLMES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Edward W. MURRAY; W.P. Rogers; Thomas R. Israel,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 88-7575.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: April 29, 1988.
    Decided: May 27, 1988.

    Sherlocke Evan Francis Holmes, appellant pro se.


    Nelson H.C. Fisher (Office of the Attorney General of Virginia), for
    appellees.
    Before DONALD RUSSELL, CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit
    Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Sherlocke Evan Francis Holmes appeals from the district court's order denying
    relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district
    court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holmes v. Murray, C/A No. 87-49H (W.D.Va. Mar. 2, 1988).

    Holmes's motion for intervention or injunction is denied. We dispense with oral


    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional

    process.
    3

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like