Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Murphy v. Flanagan, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Troy Lamont Murphy appealed a district court's dismissal of his complaint against Louise W. Flanagan. The appeals court reviewed the record and determined Murphy's appeal was frivolous, so they dismissed the appeal for the same reasons stated by the district court in its previous dismissal. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-07-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6658

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Troy Lamont Murphy appealed a district court's dismissal of his complaint against Louise W. Flanagan. The appeals court reviewed the record and determined Murphy's appeal was frivolous, so they dismissed the appeal for the same reasons stated by the district court in its previous dismissal. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Murphy v. Flanagan, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Troy Lamont Murphy appealed a district court's dismissal of his complaint against Louise W. Flanagan. The appeals court reviewed the record and determined Murphy's appeal was frivolous, so they dismissed the appeal for the same reasons stated by the district court in its previous dismissal. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary because the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6658

    TROY LAMONT MURPHY,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    LOUISE W. FLANAGAN,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (5:07-ct-3017-BO)

    Submitted: July 19, 2007

    Decided:

    July 25, 2007

    Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Troy Lamont Murphy, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Troy Lamont Murphy appeals the district courts order
    dismissing under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) his complaint
    filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau
    of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find that this appeal is frivolous.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the

    appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.


    Flanagan,

    No.

    5:07-ct-3017-BO

    (E.D.N.C.

    Apr.

    10,

    Murphy v.
    2007).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    - 2 -

    You might also like