Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Trent v. Stansberry, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny in part and dismiss without prejudice in part Robert Lee Trent's petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The district court had denied relief in part and dismissed without prejudice in part for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-05-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-6034

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny in part and dismiss without prejudice in part Robert Lee Trent's petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The district court had denied relief in part and dismissed without prejudice in part for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Trent v. Stansberry, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny in part and dismiss without prejudice in part Robert Lee Trent's petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The district court had denied relief in part and dismissed without prejudice in part for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-6034

    ROBERT LEE TRENT,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-04-753-5-FL)

    Submitted:

    May 19, 2005

    Decided:

    May 24, 2005

    Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert Lee Trent, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert Lee Trent seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying relief in part on his petition filed pursuant to 28
    U.S.C. 2241 (2000) and dismissing without prejudice in part for
    failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court. Trent v. Stansberry, No.


    CA-04-753-5-FL (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 6, 2004; entered Dec. 16,
    2004).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like