Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Maxwell, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Shelton Lamont Maxwell's Rule 35 motion. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Maxwell's Rule 35 motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-01-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7835

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Shelton Lamont Maxwell's Rule 35 motion. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Maxwell's Rule 35 motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Maxwell, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Shelton Lamont Maxwell's Rule 35 motion. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As such, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Maxwell's Rule 35 motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7835

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    SHELTON LAMONT MAXWELL,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
    District Judge. (CR-94-6-V)

    Submitted:

    December 20, 2001

    Decided:

    January 9, 2002

    Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Shelton Lamont Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Shelton Lamont Maxwell appeals from the district courts order
    denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion.

    We have reviewed the rec-

    ord and the district courts opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    United States v. Maxwell, No. CR-94-6-V (W.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 2001).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like