Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Remington, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    18 views2 pages
    Larry Thomas Remington appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Remington's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Remington was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-06-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6536

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Larry Thomas Remington appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Remington's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Remington was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    18 views2 pages

    United States v. Remington, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Larry Thomas Remington appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied Remington's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Remington was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6536

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    LARRY THOMAS REMINGTON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    W. Earl Britt, Senior
    District Judge. (CR-00-25-BR, CA-01-801-5-BR)

    Submitted:

    June 13, 2002

    Decided:

    June 19, 2002

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Larry Thomas Remington, Appellant Pro Se.
    Felice McConnell
    Corpening, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES OF ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Larry Thomas Remington seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2001). We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion
    and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate

    of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the


    district court.

    United States v. Remington, Nos. CR-00-25-BR; CA-

    01-801-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan. 17, 2002).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like