Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Cassellv. FNU Dawkins, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Charles Cassell's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The order denies Cassell's motions for copies and to subpoena evidence. It finds no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the complaint. The appeals court affirms the dismissal and will not hear oral arguments because the relevant facts and legal issues are adequately explained in the court documents.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-10-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6825

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Charles Cassell's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The order denies Cassell's motions for copies and to subpoena evidence. It finds no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the complaint. The appeals court affirms the dismissal and will not hear oral arguments because the relevant facts and legal issues are adequately explained in the court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Cassellv. FNU Dawkins, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Charles Cassell's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The order denies Cassell's motions for copies and to subpoena evidence. It finds no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the complaint. The appeals court affirms the dismissal and will not hear oral arguments because the relevant facts and legal issues are adequately explained in the court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6825

    CHARLES M. CASSELL, III,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    FNU DAWKINS, Dr.; GUARDS ON RED UNIT LOCK UP; RECEIVING
    OFFICERS, November 6 between 8 and 8:30 pm,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
    Graham C. Mullen,
    Senior District Judge. (5:10-cv-00069-GCM)

    Submitted:

    September 28, 2010

    Decided:

    October 6, 2010

    Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Charles M. Cassell, III, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles M. Cassell, III, appeals the district courts
    order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    we

    affirm

    for

    Cassell v.

    FNU

    June 3, 2010).
    subpoena

    all

    the

    reasons

    Dawkins,

    Dr.,

    stated
    No.

    by

    the

    We have

    Accordingly,

    district

    5:10-cv-00069-GCM

    court.

    (W.D.N.C.

    We deny Cassells motions for copies and to

    evidence

    and

    exhibits.

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like