Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lorenzo A. Scorpio v. Cecil W. Johnson, Judge, Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of The City of Portsmouth, 923 F.2d 849, 4th Cir. (1991)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Lorenzo A. Scorpio filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Cecil W. Johnson, a judge in the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of the City of Portsmouth. The district court denied relief to Scorpio. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding that Scorpio's appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning of the district court's opinion that denied relief to Scorpio in his § 1983 claim against Judge Johnson.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1991-01-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 923 F.2d 849 Docket: 90-6138

    Original Title

    Lorenzo A. Scorpio v. Cecil W. Johnson, Judge, Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of the City of Portsmouth, 923 F.2d 849, 4th Cir. (1991)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Lorenzo A. Scorpio filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Cecil W. Johnson, a judge in the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of the City of Portsmouth. The district court denied relief to Scorpio. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding that Scorpio's appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning of the district court's opinion that denied relief to Scorpio in his § 1983 claim against Judge Johnson.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Lorenzo A. Scorpio v. Cecil W. Johnson, Judge, Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of The City of Portsmouth, 923 F.2d 849, 4th Cir. (1991)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Lorenzo A. Scorpio filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Cecil W. Johnson, a judge in the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of the City of Portsmouth. The district court denied relief to Scorpio. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding that Scorpio's appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning of the district court's opinion that denied relief to Scorpio in his § 1983 claim against Judge Johnson.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    923 F.

    2d 849
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Lorenzo A. SCORPIO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Cecil W. JOHNSON, Judge, Juvenile and Domestic Relations
    Court of the City of Portsmouth, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 90-6138.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Nov. 6, 1990.
    Decided Jan. 17, 1991.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-90-411-AM)
    Lorenzo A. Scorpio, appellant pro se.
    E.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before K.K. HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Lorenzo A. Scorpio appeals from the district court's order denying relief under
    42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Scorpio v. Johnson, CA-90-411-AM (E.D.Va.
    Aug. 7, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    2

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like