Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Sturgill v. Apfel, Commissioner, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    1) Carolyn Sturgill appealed the district court's decision affirming the Commissioner's denial of her claim for supplemental security income benefits. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found that substantial evidence supported the Commissioner's decision to deny benefits. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-10-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-1466

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Carolyn Sturgill appealed the district court's decision affirming the Commissioner's denial of her claim for supplemental security income benefits. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found that substantial evidence supported the Commissioner's decision to deny benefits. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Sturgill v. Apfel, Commissioner, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Carolyn Sturgill appealed the district court's decision affirming the Commissioner's denial of her claim for supplemental security income benefits. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found that substantial evidence supported the Commissioner's decision to deny benefits. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-1466

    CAROLYN R. STURGILL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    KENNETH S.
    SECURITY,

    APFEL,

    COMMISSIONER

    OF

    SOCIAL
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District
    Judge. (CA-96-127-B)

    Submitted:

    September 30, 1998

    Decided:

    October 14, 1998

    Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Carolyn R. Sturgill, Appellant Pro Se. David Marcellus Frazier,
    SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Julie
    C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Carolyn R. Sturgill appeals the district courts order affirming the Commissioners denial of supplemental security income benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion
    and find that substantial evidence supports the Commissioners
    decision. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Sturgill v. Apfel, Commr of Soc. Sec., No. CA-96-127-B
    (W.D. Va. Feb. 26, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like