Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Stevens, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Delton Scott Stevens appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in United States v. Stevens, No. 7:90-cr-00310-GRA-1 (D.S.C. June 3, 2008). The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-10-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-7008

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Delton Scott Stevens appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in United States v. Stevens, No. 7:90-cr-00310-GRA-1 (D.S.C. June 3, 2008). The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Stevens, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. It states that Delton Scott Stevens appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in United States v. Stevens, No. 7:90-cr-00310-GRA-1 (D.S.C. June 3, 2008). The Court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-7008

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    DELTON SCOTT STEVENS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
    Judge. (7:90-cr-00310-GRA-1)

    Submitted:

    October 14, 2008

    Decided:

    October 17, 2008

    Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Delton Scott Stevens, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Delton
    order

    denying

    Scott

    his

    18

    U.S.C.

    reduction of sentence.
    reversible error.
    by

    the

    district

    Stevens

    appeals

    the

    3582(c)(2)

    district
    (2000)

    argument

    adequately

    motion

    for

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    court.

    United

    States

    7:90-cr-00310-GRA-1 (D.S.C. June 3, 2008).


    oral

    courts

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    v.

    Stevens,

    No.

    We dispense with

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like