Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lester v. Saunders, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Randall Posey Lester appealed a district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. It denied Lester's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the habeas petition. The Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-09-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6974

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Randall Posey Lester appealed a district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. It denied Lester's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the habeas petition. The Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Lester v. Saunders, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Randall Posey Lester appealed a district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. It denied Lester's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning for denying the habeas petition. The Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6974

    RANDALL POSEY LESTER,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    LONNIE M. SAUNDERS,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
    Judge. (CA-00-699-7)

    Submitted:

    August 23, 2001

    Decided:

    September 5, 2001

    Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Randall Posey Lester, Appellant Pro Se.
    Michael Thomas Judge,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Randall

    Posey

    Lester

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West


    1994 & Supp. 2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
    (W.D. Va. Apr. 27, 2001).

    Lester v. Saunders, No. CA-00-699-7

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like