Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Eury v. Morris, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury appealed the district court's denial of relief on his civil rights complaint to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the district court's July 3, 2001 decision. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-09-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7140

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury appealed the district court's denial of relief on his civil rights complaint to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the district court's July 3, 2001 decision. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    Eury v. Morris, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury appealed the district court's denial of relief on his civil rights complaint to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in the district court's July 3, 2001 decision. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7140

    MUHAMMAD ABD SALEEM EURY,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    ALAN MORRIS; PAUL CUMMINGS; KESHA FOWLKES;
    JAMES KEELING; DANIEL BRAXTON, Warden; ROBERT
    R. DOUMAR, Judge,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-01-436-2)

    Submitted:

    August 23, 2001

    Decided:

    September 5, 2001

    Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the
    record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible
    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    See Eury v. Morris, No. CA-01-436-2 (E.D. Va. July 3,

    2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like