Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Odinkemelu v. Williams, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Christopher Odinkemelu's civil complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The appellate court also granted the defendants' motion for sanctions, awarding them reasonable costs and attorneys' fees. Additionally, the court enjoined Odinkemelu from filing any further civil actions in the appellate court until the monetary sanctions are paid, unless a district court judge certifies that his claim is not frivolous.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-09-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-1594

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Christopher Odinkemelu's civil complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The appellate court also granted the defendants' motion for sanctions, awarding them reasonable costs and attorneys' fees. Additionally, the court enjoined Odinkemelu from filing any further civil actions in the appellate court until the monetary sanctions are paid, unless a district court judge certifies that his claim is not frivolous.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Odinkemelu v. Williams, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Christopher Odinkemelu's civil complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The appellate court also granted the defendants' motion for sanctions, awarding them reasonable costs and attorneys' fees. Additionally, the court enjoined Odinkemelu from filing any further civil actions in the appellate court until the monetary sanctions are paid, unless a district court judge certifies that his claim is not frivolous.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-1594

    CHRISTOPHER J. ODINKEMELU,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JORJA WILLIAMS; MYRTLE FOUST; VERONICA MCLEAN;
    KAREN JONES; ALICIA OAKLEY RESENDIZ,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-00-750-1)

    Submitted:

    September 20, 2001

    Decided:

    September 26, 2001

    Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Christopher J. Odinkemelu, Appellant Pro Se. Peter George Pappas,
    Brian Stephen Clarke, ADAMS, KLEEMEIER, HAGAN, HANNAH & FOUTS,
    Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Christopher J. Odinkemelu appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his civil complaint.

    We have reviewed the record and

    the district courts opinion accepting the recommendation of the


    magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    Accordingly, we
    See Odinkemelu v.

    Williams, No. CA-00-750-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2001).

    Defendants

    motion for sanctions is granted, and Defendants are awarded reasonable costs and attorneys fees.

    In addition, we enjoin Odinkemelu

    from filing any further civil actions in this court until such time
    as these monetary sanctions are paid, and unless a district court
    judge certifies that his claim is not frivolous.

    We dispense with

    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like