Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • William Davis v. John Yeager, JR., 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of William Thomas Davis's complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the complaint. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-12-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-1928

    Original Title

    William Davis v. John Yeager, Jr., 4th Cir. (2011)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of William Thomas Davis's complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the complaint. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    William Davis v. John Yeager, JR., 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of William Thomas Davis's complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the complaint. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-1928

    WILLIAM THOMAS DAVIS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JOHN RICHARD YEAGER, JR.,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.
    Frederick P. Stamp,
    Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:11-cv-00061-FPS-JES)

    Submitted:

    December 12, 2011

    Decided:

    December 30, 2011

    Before AGEE, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    William Thomas Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    William

    Thomas

    Davis

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and


    dismissing his complaint.
    no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    See Davis v. Yeager, No. 5:11-cv-

    00061-FPS-JES (N.D. W. Va. Aug. 10, 2011).


    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    We dispense with

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like