Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hatchett v. Potter, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    17 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Dorothy Hatchett and John Potter, the Postmaster General. The district court had granted the Postmaster General's motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, which Hatchett appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-12-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-1046

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Dorothy Hatchett and John Potter, the Postmaster General. The district court had granted the Postmaster General's motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, which Hatchett appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    17 views2 pages

    Hatchett v. Potter, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Dorothy Hatchett and John Potter, the Postmaster General. The district court had granted the Postmaster General's motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, which Hatchett appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-1046

    DOROTHY D. HATCHETT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN POTTER, Postmaster General, United States
    Postal Service,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, District
    Judge. (CA-00-461)

    Submitted:

    December 3, 2002

    Decided:

    December 18, 2002

    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Dorothy D. Hatchett, Appellant Pro Se.


    Debra Jean Prillaman,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Stephan James
    Boardman, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Dorothy

    D.

    Hatchett

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    granting Appellees Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative,


    Motion for Summary Judgment.

    We have reviewed the record and find

    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the


    district court.

    See Hatchett v. Potter, No. CA-00-461 (E.D. Va.

    Dec. 7, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like