Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Charles Verna, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Charles Paul Hickman Verna appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Verna a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Verna was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-05-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6143

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charles Paul Hickman Verna appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Verna a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Verna was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Charles Verna, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Paul Hickman Verna appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Verna a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning that Verna was not entitled to relief under § 2255.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6143

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    CHARLES PAUL HICKMAN VERNA,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-95-15-BO, CA-98-507-BO-5)

    Submitted:

    May 13, 1999

    Decided:

    May 19, 1999

    Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Charles Paul Hickman Verna, Appellant Pro Se.
    Fenita Morris
    Shepard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles Paul Hickman Verna seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994
    & Supp. 1998).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v. Verna, Nos. CR-

    95-15-BO; CA-98-507-BO-5 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 29, 1998).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like