Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Osborne, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Nathaniel Jerome Osborne's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore denied Osborne's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its September 30, 1998 opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-04-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7513

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Nathaniel Jerome Osborne's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore denied Osborne's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its September 30, 1998 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Osborne, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Nathaniel Jerome Osborne's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. It therefore denied Osborne's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its September 30, 1998 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7513

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    NATHANIEL JEROME OSBORNE, a/k/a Rome,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
    Judge. (CR-95-139, CA-97-1014-2)

    Submitted:

    April 15, 1999

    Decided:

    April 21, 1999

    Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Nathaniel Jerome Osborne, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Nathaniel Jerome Osborne seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994
    & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district courts
    opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a cer-

    tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning


    of the district court.

    See United States v. Osborne, Nos. CR-95-

    139; CA-97-1014-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 1998). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like