Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Bannerman, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    17 views2 pages
    Franklyn Earl Bannerman filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal the district court's denial of his motion. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The appeals court decided that oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-08-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6439

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Franklyn Earl Bannerman filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal the district court's denial of his motion. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The appeals court decided that oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    17 views2 pages

    United States v. Bannerman, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Franklyn Earl Bannerman filed a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to appeal the district court's denial of his motion. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The appeals court decided that oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6439

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    FRANKLYN EARL BANNERMAN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-90-105-N, CA-97-287-2)

    Submitted:

    August 10, 1999

    Decided:

    August 31, 1999

    Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    James J. Vergara, Jr., VERGARA & ASSOCIATES, Hopewell, Virginia;
    Cheryl Johns Sturm, Westtown, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. Laura
    Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Franklyn Earl Bannerman seeks to appeal the district courts
    order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994
    & Supp. 1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v. Bannerman,

    No. CR-90-105-N; CA-97-287-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 1999). We dispense


    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like