Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Parks v. Barlow, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Arnold Lynn Parks (appellant) and Lewis Barlow (appellee). The district court had dismissed Parks' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice under Rule 41(b). The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling to dismiss the complaint. The appeals court provided no oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-04-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7923

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Arnold Lynn Parks (appellant) and Lewis Barlow (appellee). The district court had dismissed Parks' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice under Rule 41(b). The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling to dismiss the complaint. The appeals court provided no oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Parks v. Barlow, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Arnold Lynn Parks (appellant) and Lewis Barlow (appellee). The district court had dismissed Parks' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice under Rule 41(b). The appeals court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's ruling to dismiss the complaint. The appeals court provided no oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7923

    ARNOLD LYNN PARKS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    LEWIS BARLOW,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
    (CA-95-525)
    Submitted:

    April 15, 1996

    Decided:

    April 29, 1996

    Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Arnold Lynn Parks, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing
    without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint under Fed.
    R. Civ. P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parks v. Barlow, No.
    CA-95-525 (E.D. Va. Oct. 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like