Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Applegate v. Fray, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the defendants, dismissing Patricia Applegate's action, and denying her motion for reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The appellate court granted Applegate in forma pauperis status and affirmed the district court's decision based on its reasoning.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-10-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-1710

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the defendants, dismissing Patricia Applegate's action, and denying her motion for reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The appellate court granted Applegate in forma pauperis status and affirmed the district court's decision based on its reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Applegate v. Fray, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the defendants, dismissing Patricia Applegate's action, and denying her motion for reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings. The appellate court granted Applegate in forma pauperis status and affirmed the district court's decision based on its reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-1710

    PATRICIA F. APPLEGATE, R.N.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN MICHAEL FRAY, Phd.; ROBERT S. BOYD,
    Reverend; THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF VIRGINIA,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
    (CA-95-814)
    Submitted:

    October 3, 1996

    Decided:

    October 9, 1996

    Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Patricia F. Applegate, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Morris Holleran,
    MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia; Roger
    Louis Williams, WILLIAMS, BUTLER & PIERCE, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's orders granting
    Defendants' motions for summary judgment, dismissing her action,
    and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we grant in forma pauperis status and affirm
    on the reasoning of the district court. Applegate v. Fray, No. CA95-814 (E.D. Va. Apr. 19 & May 17, 1996). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like