Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Arthur V., 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Donald William Arthur filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the docket sheet and found that the district court had denied Arthur's motion on February 6, 2003. Therefore, the court denied the mandamus petition as moot since the district court had recently decided the case.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-03-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-6100

    Original Title

    In re: Arthur v., 4th Cir. (2003)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Donald William Arthur filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the docket sheet and found that the district court had denied Arthur's motion on February 6, 2003. Therefore, the court denied the mandamus petition as moot since the district court had recently decided the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    In Re: Arthur V., 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Donald William Arthur filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the docket sheet and found that the district court had denied Arthur's motion on February 6, 2003. Therefore, the court denied the mandamus petition as moot since the district court had recently decided the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-6100

    In Re: DONALD WILLIAM ARTHUR,


    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (CR-99-62, CA-01-16-3)

    Submitted:

    March 7, 2003

    Decided:

    March 31, 2003

    Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Donald William Arthur, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Donald William Arthur petitions for a writ of mandamus,
    alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28
    U.S.C. 2255 (2000) motion.

    He seeks an order from this court

    directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet
    reveals that the district court denied Arthurs motion on February
    6, 2003.

    Accordingly, because the district court has recently

    decided Arthurs case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot.

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like