Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re Williams V., 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Rodney T. Williams filed a petition for a writ of mandamus with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, alleging that the district court had unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The Fourth Circuit denied the petition for a writ of mandamus, finding that there had been no undue delay by the district court in addressing Williams' habeas petition. The Fourth Circuit also granted Williams' request to proceed in forma pauperis but dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-08-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-6788

    Original Title

    In Re Williams v., 4th Cir. (2003)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Rodney T. Williams filed a petition for a writ of mandamus with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, alleging that the district court had unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The Fourth Circuit denied the petition for a writ of mandamus, finding that there had been no undue delay by the district court in addressing Williams' habeas petition. The Fourth Circuit also granted Williams' request to proceed in forma pauperis but dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    In Re Williams V., 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Rodney T. Williams filed a petition for a writ of mandamus with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, alleging that the district court had unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The Fourth Circuit denied the petition for a writ of mandamus, finding that there had been no undue delay by the district court in addressing Williams' habeas petition. The Fourth Circuit also granted Williams' request to proceed in forma pauperis but dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-6788

    In Re:

    RODNEY T. WILLIAMS,
    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

    Submitted:

    July 9, 2003

    (CA-02-648)

    Decided:

    August 11, 2003

    Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Rodney T. Williams, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Rodney T. Williams petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
    the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.
    2241 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing
    the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in
    the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed
    in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus.

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like