Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Steven Hall V., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The court denied Steven Hall's petition for a writ of mandamus to direct the district court to act on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The court's review found that the district court had recently denied the § 2255 motion as moot. Therefore, the court denied the mandamus petition as the district court had now acted on the motion, rendering the petition moot. The court also denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis but dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-09-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-1773

    Original Title

    In Re: Steven Hall v., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The court denied Steven Hall's petition for a writ of mandamus to direct the district court to act on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The court's review found that the district court had recently denied the § 2255 motion as moot. Therefore, the court denied the mandamus petition as the district court had now acted on the motion, rendering the petition moot. The court also denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis but dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    In Re: Steven Hall V., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The court denied Steven Hall's petition for a writ of mandamus to direct the district court to act on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The court's review found that the district court had recently denied the § 2255 motion as moot. Therefore, the court denied the mandamus petition as the district court had now acted on the motion, rendering the petition moot. The court also denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis but dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-1773

    IN RE:

    STEVEN JAMES HALL, a/k/a Contourimpco,

    Petitioner.

    On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus.

    Submitted:

    September 19, 2013

    (1:08-cr-00015-MR-1)

    Decided:

    September 24, 2013

    Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Steven James Hall, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Steven

    J.

    Hall

    petitions

    for

    writ

    of

    mandamus,

    alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28


    U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2013) motion.

    He seeks an order

    from this court directing the district court to act.

    Our review

    of the district courts docket reveals that the district court


    recently
    leave

    to

    denied

    the

    proceed

    in

    petition as moot.
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    motion.
    forma

    Accordingly,
    pauperis,

    although

    we

    deny

    we

    the

    grant

    mandamus

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like