Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: George Jefferson, III, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    George Jefferson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The appeals court denied the petition, finding no undue delay based on the current record. As the facts and legal issues were clear, the court dispensed with oral arguments. The unpublished opinion does not constitute binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-04-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-1320

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    George Jefferson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The appeals court denied the petition, finding no undue delay based on the current record. As the facts and legal issues were clear, the court dispensed with oral arguments. The unpublished opinion does not constitute binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    In Re: George Jefferson, III, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    George Jefferson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. The appeals court denied the petition, finding no undue delay based on the current record. As the facts and legal issues were clear, the court dispensed with oral arguments. The unpublished opinion does not constitute binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-1320

    In re:

    GEORGE JEFFERSON, III, a/k/a Ace,


    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus


    (No. 5:09-cr-00251-FL-1)

    Submitted:

    April 18, 2013

    Decided:

    April 23, 2013

    Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    George Jefferson, III, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    George

    Jefferson,

    III,

    petitions

    for

    writ

    of

    mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in


    ruling on his 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion.

    He

    seeks an order from this court directing the district court to


    act.

    We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in

    the district court.

    Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition.

    We grant permission to proceed in forma pauperis.

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like