Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: James Platts V., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The petitioner filed a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The appeals court found no undue delay based on the record. It denied the mandamus petition and ruled oral argument was unnecessary. The unpublished opinion does not constitute binding precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-07-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-1235

    Original Title

    In Re: James Platts v., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The petitioner filed a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The appeals court found no undue delay based on the record. It denied the mandamus petition and ruled oral argument was unnecessary. The unpublished opinion does not constitute binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    In Re: James Platts V., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The petitioner filed a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The appeals court found no undue delay based on the record. It denied the mandamus petition and ruled oral argument was unnecessary. The unpublished opinion does not constitute binding precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-1235

    In Re:

    JAMES C. PLATTS,
    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (1:13-cv-00257-IMK-JES)

    Submitted:

    June 26, 2014

    Decided:

    July 1, 2014

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    James C. Platts, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    James

    C.

    Platts

    petitions

    for

    writ

    of

    mandamus,

    alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on


    his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (2012) petition.

    He seeks an order from

    this court directing the district court to act.


    present
    court.

    record

    does

    not

    reveal

    undue

    delay

    in

    We find the
    the

    district

    Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis

    and deny the mandamus petition.

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like