Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Vincent Rogers, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Vincent Rogers filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed ruling on his motion for a new trial. The appeals court found no undue delay based on the current record and denied the petition. Unpublished opinions from the appeals court are not binding precedent. The court also denied oral arguments, finding the existing filings sufficient to make a decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-05-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-1355

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Vincent Rogers filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed ruling on his motion for a new trial. The appeals court found no undue delay based on the current record and denied the petition. Unpublished opinions from the appeals court are not binding precedent. The court also denied oral arguments, finding the existing filings sufficient to make a decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    In Re: Vincent Rogers, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Vincent Rogers filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed ruling on his motion for a new trial. The appeals court found no undue delay based on the current record and denied the petition. Unpublished opinions from the appeals court are not binding precedent. The court also denied oral arguments, finding the existing filings sufficient to make a decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-1355

    In re:

    VINCENT SHAMONT ROGERS,

    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

    Submitted:

    (7:08-cr-00216-MGL-2)

    May 23, 2013

    Before MOTZ and


    Circuit Judge.

    AGEE,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    May 28, 2013

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Vincent Shamont Rogers, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Vincent

    Shamont

    Rogers

    petitions

    for

    writ

    of

    mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in


    ruling on his motion for a new trial.

    He seeks an order from

    this court directing the district court to act.

    We find that

    the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district
    court.

    Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis

    and deny the mandamus petition.

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like