Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Moorthy Ram V., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    1) Moorthy Srinivasan Ram filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. 2) The appeals court reviewed the district court docket and found that the district court had denied Ram's motion on August 29, 2013. 3) Because the district court recently decided the case, the appeals court denied the mandamus petition as moot and granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-09-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-1819

    Original Title

    In Re: Moorthy Ram v., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Moorthy Srinivasan Ram filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. 2) The appeals court reviewed the district court docket and found that the district court had denied Ram's motion on August 29, 2013. 3) Because the district court recently decided the case, the appeals court denied the mandamus petition as moot and granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    In Re: Moorthy Ram V., 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Moorthy Srinivasan Ram filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion. 2) The appeals court reviewed the district court docket and found that the district court had denied Ram's motion on August 29, 2013. 3) Because the district court recently decided the case, the appeals court denied the mandamus petition as moot and granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-1819

    In re: MOORTHY SRINIVASAN RAM,


    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (3:09-cr-00020-HEH-1)

    Submitted:

    September 24, 2013

    Before NIEMEYER and


    Senior Circuit Judge.

    THACKER,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    September 26, 2013

    Judges,

    and

    HAMILTON,

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Moorthy Srinivasan Ram, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Moorthy

    Srinivasan

    Ram

    petitions

    for

    writ

    of

    mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting


    on his 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2013) motion.

    He seeks an

    order from this court directing the district court to act.

    Our

    review of the district courts docket reveals that the district


    court denied

    Rams

    motion

    on

    August

    29,

    2013.

    Accordingly,

    because the district court has recently decided Rams case, we


    deny the mandamus petition as moot.
    in forma pauperis.
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We grant leave to proceed

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like