Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Kebe V., 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Andre Kebe filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. After Kebe filed the mandamus petition, the district court ruled on his § 2255 motion. The appeals court denied the mandamus petition as moot since the district court had now ruled on the § 2255 motion. The court also denied Kebe's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-07-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6726

    Original Title

    In Re: Kebe v., 4th Cir. (2006)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Andre Kebe filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. After Kebe filed the mandamus petition, the district court ruled on his § 2255 motion. The appeals court denied the mandamus petition as moot since the district court had now ruled on the § 2255 motion. The court also denied Kebe's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    In Re: Kebe V., 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Andre Kebe filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. After Kebe filed the mandamus petition, the district court ruled on his § 2255 motion. The appeals court denied the mandamus petition as moot since the district court had now ruled on the § 2255 motion. The court also denied Kebe's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6726

    In Re:

    ANDRE KEBE,
    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (8:97-cr-00357)

    Submitted:

    July 17, 2006

    Decided:

    July 31, 2006

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Andre Kebe, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Andre Kebe petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the
    district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. 2255
    (2000) motion.
    delay.

    After

    He seeks release from imprisonment based on the


    Kebe

    filed

    the

    instant

    mandamus

    district court ruled on his 2255 motion.


    the mandamus petition as moot.

    petition,

    the

    Accordingly, we deny

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    The motion for appointment of counsel is

    denied.

    PETITION DENIED

    - 2 -

    You might also like