Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Romeril Appraisal v. Stevens Real Estate, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    1) Romeril Appraisal Group and Jean Romeril filed a civil action that was dismissed by the district court pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. 2) The plaintiffs filed a motion to reconsider under Rule 59(e) and a motion for leave to amend the complaint, both of which were denied by the district court. 3) On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings, so they affirmed the dismissal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-09-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-2490

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Romeril Appraisal Group and Jean Romeril filed a civil action that was dismissed by the district court pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. 2) The plaintiffs filed a motion to reconsider under Rule 59(e) and a motion for leave to amend the complaint, both of which were denied by the district court. 3) On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings, so they affirmed the dismissal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Romeril Appraisal v. Stevens Real Estate, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Romeril Appraisal Group and Jean Romeril filed a civil action that was dismissed by the district court pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. 2) The plaintiffs filed a motion to reconsider under Rule 59(e) and a motion for leave to amend the complaint, both of which were denied by the district court. 3) On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's rulings, so they affirmed the dismissal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-2490

    ROMERIL APPRAISAL GROUP, INCORPORATED; JEAN


    ROMERIL,
    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    versus
    STEVENS REAL ESTATE, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Coldwell Banker Stevens Realtors; ANTHONY GIGLIO;
    DANIEL BOWES; LISA YARNELL-KRAUSS,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    PRINCE WILLIAM ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS, INCORPORATED; THOMAS MORCOM; WILLARD GALBRAITH,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
    Judge. (CA-00-627-A)

    Submitted:

    July 31, 2001

    Decided:

    September 10, 2001

    Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and Irene M. KEELEY,


    Chief United States District Judge for the Northern District of
    West Virginia, sitting by designation.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Thomas O. Mason, Rachel L. Smith, WILLIAMS, MULLEN, CLARK &


    DOBBINS, McLean, Virginia; James S. DelSordo, Manassas, Virginia,
    for Appellants.
    Douglas M. Coleman, David S. Panzer, CARTER &
    COLEMAN, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Romeril Appraisal Group Inc. and Jean Romeril appeal the district courts orders dismissing their civil action pursuant to Fed.
    R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), denying their Motion to Reconsider filed
    pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), and denying their Motion for
    Leave to Amend filed in conjunction with the Motion to Reconsider.
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and
    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

    of the district court. See Romeril Appraisal Group, Inc. v. Stevens


    Real Estate, Inc., No. CA-00-627-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 12, 2000).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like