Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Williams v. Bassett, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    James Edward Williams appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration of its order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison doctors. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. In an unpublished opinion, the appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Williams' motion for reconsideration and denying relief on the underlying § 1983 complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-01-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-6938

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    James Edward Williams appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration of its order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison doctors. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. In an unpublished opinion, the appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Williams' motion for reconsideration and denying relief on the underlying § 1983 complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    12 views2 pages

    Williams v. Bassett, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    James Edward Williams appealed the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration of its order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison doctors. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. In an unpublished opinion, the appeals court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying Williams' motion for reconsideration and denying relief on the underlying § 1983 complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-6938

    JAMES EDWARD WILLIAMS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    F. H. BASSETT, III, Doctor at Central Prison;
    M. CURZAN, Doctor at Central Prison; M. SUMA,
    Doctor at Central Prison; DOCTOR SAMIDI;
    DOCTOR UMESI,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
    District Judge. (5:05-ct-00539-FL)

    Submitted:

    December 21, 2006

    Decided:

    January 3, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    James Edward Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    James Edward Williams appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion for reconsideration of the district courts
    order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Williams v. Umesi, No. 5:05-ct-00539-FL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 7,

    2006).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like