Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ferrell v. NC Dept of Corr, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Dwain Ferrell's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in that court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-04-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6095

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Dwain Ferrell's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in that court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Ferrell v. NC Dept of Corr, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal of Dwain Ferrell's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in that court's opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6095

    DWAIN FERRELL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION;
    CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA; MARY A.
    GOSMIRE, c/o Ferrara Pan Candy Company; KEEFE
    SUPPLY COMPANY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    District Judge. (CA-01-771-H)

    Submitted:

    April 18, 2002

    Decided:

    April 26, 2002

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Dwain Ferrell, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Dwain Ferrell appeals the district courts order dismissing as
    frivolous his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find
    no reversible error.
    the district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of


    See Ferrell v. North Carolina Dept of Corr.,

    No. CA-01-771-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 26, 2001).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like