Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Deonza Carmichael, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    24 views2 pages
    Deonza Lamar Carmichael appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. It also denied Carmichael's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-06-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6205

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Deonza Lamar Carmichael appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. It also denied Carmichael's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    24 views2 pages

    United States v. Deonza Carmichael, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Deonza Lamar Carmichael appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. It also denied Carmichael's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6205

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    DEONZA LAMAR CARMICHAEL,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Louise W. Flanagan,
    District Judge. (5:08-cr-00229-FL-2; 5:12-cv-00288-FL)

    Submitted:

    May 28, 2015

    Decided:

    June 4, 2015

    Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Deonza
    Lamar
    Carmichael,
    Appellant
    Pro
    Se.
    Jennifer
    P.
    May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Deonza Lamar Carmichael appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2255 (2012) motion.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United

    States v. Carmichael, No. 5:08-cr-00229-FL-2; 5:12-cv-00288-FL


    (E.D.N.C.

    Feb.

    6,

    2014);

    see

    also

    United

    States

    v.

    Foote,

    __F.3d__, 2015 WL 1883538 (4th Cir. Apr. 27, 2015), petition for
    cert. filed (May 12, 2015) (No. 14-9792).

    We deny Carmichaels

    motion

    dispense

    for

    appointment

    of

    counsel

    and

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like