Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Sprinkle v. Schilling, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    David Frank Sprinkle filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was dismissed by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Sprinkle appealed the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-09-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-7086

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    David Frank Sprinkle filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was dismissed by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Sprinkle appealed the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Sprinkle v. Schilling, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    David Frank Sprinkle filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was dismissed by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Sprinkle appealed the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-7086

    DAVID FRANK SPRINKLE,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    FRED SCHILLING, Director; STANLEY
    Medical Doctor; NURSE ELKO,

    CYPRESS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge.
    (7:07-cv-00335-GEC)

    Submitted:

    September 11, 2007

    Decided:

    September 17, 2007

    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    David Frank Sprinkle, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    David Frank Sprinkle appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
    1915A(b) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court. Sprinkle v. Schilling, No. 7:07-cv-00335-gec
    (W.D. Va. July 11, 2007).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like