Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Archer v. Amonette, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Frank Austin Archer filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against medical professionals which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the case and found no reversible errors, affirming the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-10-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6681

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Frank Austin Archer filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against medical professionals which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the case and found no reversible errors, affirming the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Archer v. Amonette, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Frank Austin Archer filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against medical professionals which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the case and found no reversible errors, affirming the district court's ruling. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6681

    FRANK AUSTIN ARCHER,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    WILBUR F. AMONETTE, Doctor; TIMOTHY PAUL
    THOMPSON;
    REBECCA
    ARNEY,
    Nurse;
    DEBORAH
    MICHELLE KESLING, Nurse,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge.
    (7:07-cv-00088-GEC)

    Submitted:

    October 11, 2007

    Decided:

    October 17, 2007

    Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Frank Austin Archer, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Frank Austin Archer appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Archer v.

    Amonette, No. 7:07-cv-00088-GEC (W.D. Va. filed on Apr. 9, 2007 &


    entered on Apr. 10, 2007).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like