Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Marshall v. Compher, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Marian Marshall and Gary Compher. The district court had granted Gary Compher's motion to dismiss. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-08-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-1342

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Marian Marshall and Gary Compher. The district court had granted Gary Compher's motion to dismiss. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Marshall v. Compher, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Marian Marshall and Gary Compher. The district court had granted Gary Compher's motion to dismiss. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-1342

    MARIAN MARSHALL,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    GARY COMPHER,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:07-cv02394-AMD)

    Submitted:

    July 31, 2008

    Decided:

    August 4, 2008

    Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Marian Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Joseph OBrien, Jr.,


    Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Marian

    Marshall

    appeals

    the

    district

    granting Gary Comphers motion to dismiss.


    record and find no reversible error.

    courts

    order

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court. Marshall v. Compher, No.


    1:07-cv-02394-AMD (D. Md. Mar. 3, 2008).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like