Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Cooper, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Carl Benit Cooper appealed the district court's denial of his motion under Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying Cooper's motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-10-12 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6982

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Carl Benit Cooper appealed the district court's denial of his motion under Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying Cooper's motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Cooper, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Carl Benit Cooper appealed the district court's denial of his motion under Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for denying Cooper's motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6982

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    CARL BENIT COOPER,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. Falcon B. Hawkins, Senior District
    Judge. (CR-95-206)

    Submitted:

    October 4, 2001

    Decided:

    October 12, 2001

    Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Carl Benit Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Howe Hendricks, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Carl Benit Cooper appeals the district court order denying his
    motion filed under Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal
    Procedure.

    We have reviewed the record and the district court

    order and find no reversible order.


    reasoning of the district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the

    See United States v. Cooper, No.

    CR-95-206 (D.S.C. filed Mar. 2, 2001; entered March 6, 2001).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like