Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lipich v. Hinkle, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case. Paul Lipich filed a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. §2254 challenging his conviction, which the district court denied. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying Lipich a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-01-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7376

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case. Paul Lipich filed a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. §2254 challenging his conviction, which the district court denied. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying Lipich a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Lipich v. Hinkle, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3 sentence summary of an unpublished United States Court of Appeals case. Paul Lipich filed a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. §2254 challenging his conviction, which the district court denied. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying Lipich a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7376

    PAUL ARTHUR LIPICH,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    GEORGE M. HINKLE, Warden,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-98-499-R)

    Submitted:

    December 22, 1998

    Decided:

    January 11, 1999

    Before HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Paul Arthur Lipich, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Paul Arthur Lipich seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West
    1994 & Supp. 1998).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny


    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Lipich v. Hinkle, No. CA-98-499R (W.D. Va. Sept. 10, 1998).

    We dispense with oral argument be-

    cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like