Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ralph Alexander-El v. Warren, Correctional Dietary Sergeant Foster, Correctional Dietary Sergeant, 92 F.3d 1176, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    Ralph Alexander-El filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two correctional dietary sergeants which was denied by the district court. Alexander-El appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the record or reasoning of the lower court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-08-05 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 92 F.3d 1176 Docket: 96-6388

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ralph Alexander-El filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two correctional dietary sergeants which was denied by the district court. Alexander-El appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the record or reasoning of the lower court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    Ralph Alexander-El v. Warren, Correctional Dietary Sergeant Foster, Correctional Dietary Sergeant, 92 F.3d 1176, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ralph Alexander-El filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two correctional dietary sergeants which was denied by the district court. Alexander-El appealed the denial to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the record or reasoning of the lower court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    92 F.

    3d 1176

    Ralph ALEXANDER-EL, Plaintiff--Appellant,


    v.
    WARREN, Correctional Dietary Sergeant; Foster, Correctional
    Dietary Sergeant, Defendants--Appellees.
    No. 96-6388.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: July 23, 1996
    Decided: August 5, 1996

    Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. Alexander-El v. Warren, No. CA-96-459-AW (D.Md. Feb.
    26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like